Here’s how the Freight Web Atlas is useful (and what distinguishes it) in the context of NYS freight planning:
From the information available, here are the major types of content and data themes embedded in the Atlas:
Data Theme / Layer | What it shows | Purpose / Use |
|---|---|---|
Freight Core Highway Network | The defined set of highway segments deemed critical for freight traffic. | Helps prioritize maintenance, upgrades, and investments on corridors of highest freight importance. |
Annual Average Daily Truck Traffic (AADTT) | Truck traffic volumes (average daily) along roadway segments. | To identify high‑use freight corridors, congestion, capacity stress, and performance baselines. |
Geographic units | Counties, MPO (Metropolitan Planning Organization) boundaries, REDC (Regional Economic Development Councils), Census tracts. | To let users zoom into or view data aggregated by these geographies. |
Intermodal connectors / terminals / ports / yards | Connections between major freight facilities and highways, rail yards, port facilities, intermodal terminals (e.g. the “connector” segments). | So planners can see where freight facilities interface with the broader transportation network and identify bottlenecks or missing links. |
Other Freight Assets / Constraints | Possibly also includes bridges, restrictions (e.g. height/weight limits), infrastructure constraints, land use around freight corridors, and environmental / community impact layers (though explicit mention is scant in the public summary). | To inform tradeoffs: where upgrades are needed, where constraints may limit freight flow, or where community / environmental issues might arise. |
While live access was hampered in my test, here’s how the user interface appears to function (or is intended to function), based on the site’s visible elements and typical GIS mapping practices: